IMPORTANTNo, you're not
Recognised? Great artists wait to be recognised. You have done fuck all, my dear, except a huge disservice to the truth
First I would like to thank everyone for contributing to this thread.
I did this research a few years ago and it has been sat waiting to be 'recognised'. Thanks to Jill and Tony for hosting the discussion.
Or in other words, you obfuscated with as much bollocks as possible
I compiled many threads on the subject as well as summary's to help assist, but it's not a subject that can be addressed simply.
Sadly it's a canvas covered in shite
What I feel everyone should know is that the discrepancy questions and the 'Who saw Maddie' research is not a theory in itself.
It is basically the 'canvas' of the week for everyone to base their own theory on.
There are no discrepancies starting on Tuesday
After realising the discrepancies starting Tuesday, I felt that looking at witness statements to see if there was any PROOF that she was seen during the week would help to support that possibility or not. I had NO IDEA what I would find. I don't look for details to fit a theory, I look to see if details support what is 'known'.
Complete bollocks. You cannot just keep saying this and expect people not to question it. You and Baldy do make me laugh - you accept as true a sighting by a cleaner who crossed ways with the family briefly, and why not, as there is nothing to suggest otherwise, but you reject the versions of child care workers who spent every day with Madeleine on a pretext that they might have been ''confused''
I was quite shocked to see that Fatima's statement was the ONLY statement that was 'relative' proof that Maddie was seen, but was on Sunday which allowed for something to have happened before the discrepancies started TUESDAY.
Relatively satisfied. Christ, the world according to a Canadian fence painter
Please know that if Fatima's statement had been about WEDNESDAY, THIS THREAD WOULD NOT EXIST. I would be relatively satisfied that Maddie WAS seen during the week, and would then look for reasons why the discrepancies started on Tuesday (and why there appeared an effort to cover something up)
What?! Again in a human language, please.
However, Sunday supported the discrepancies starting Tuesday because of maybe trying to cover something up.
So you're still wrong
I have seen NOTHING to change my mind since I did the research in 2010 (or sooner)
There is ample proof that she was seen, from independent witnesses who knew her well, all of which you have arbitrarily dismissed.
Please keep in mind this isn't about trying to prove Maddie WASN'T seen during the week...It's about trying to find proof that she WAS seen.
So nothing happened to her until that Thursday, as there is proof she was seen.
Proof she WAS seen would be the basic 'canvas' for nothing having happened to her until that day...
No, there is ample proof she was seen
No PROOF she was seen, tells us that anyone suggesting somehing happened earlier in the week is supported.
Bullshit. And meaningless bullshit at that
It also stands true for the alternative beliefs of anyone that believes something didn't happen until Thursday.
Its NOT a theory, it is the basis for whether anyone's theory stands up.
But the fact that three independent witnesses saw her on Thursday - people who saw her every day - you dismiss out of hand.
As mentioned, if Fatima had claimed she saw her Wednesday for example and the details weather times etc fitted, then THAT would be sufficient for me to claim there was proof she was seen Wednesday and I would look for alternative explanations as to why the discrepancies started Tuesday morning.
That's not how evidence works
We don't have PROOF of some of the evidence, but by EXCLUSION we know it could be possible.
No, there is plenty of evidence that she was alive and present on Thursday
No evidence to EXCLUDE something happening to Maddie before Tuesday
Her blood was not found in the car
No evidence to EXCLUDE Maddie's blood being in the car.
No evidence to EXCLUDE the parents from being complicit in their daughter's disappearance
That was a genuine finding by someone else, not you. They have no specific witness evidence which alibis them, so the statement is true. Claiming that no-one saw Madeleine on Thursday is not true, as there is evidence to the contrary
Try and understand this, you dozy, duplicitous cow.
There are at least three completely independent people who all knew Madeleine by sight or better, who can all testify to her being alive and present on Thursday. What is more, their evidence corroborates. You cannot, therefore, simply dismiss it as ''they might have been mistaken'' when they clearly weren't. Most ludicrous of all is the suggestion that a girl who had looked after both children all week would be unable to tell the difference between Madeleine and her friend.
All your claims are fraudulent nonsense, and you are frankly an embarrassment.